![]() |
| | #1 |
| Moderator Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 755 From: a cesspit. My Camera: disposable | which kind of camera is right for you?
saw this and thought it would be handy. |
| |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 314 From: Seattle |
good read...
|
| |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 112 From: Snoqualmie, WA My Camera: Nikon D70 |
I think a D3 is right for me. |
| |
| | #4 |
| Member Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 98 From: Seattle My Camera: Konica/Minolta Maxxum 7D |
I notice that they didn't mention any of the REALLY nice high-end hardware: Hasselblad H3DII-39MS Image Sensor 36.7 x 49.0mm, 39 Megapixel CCD Effective Resolution 39 million pixels Color Depth 48-Bit RGB Color Modes Full Color Image File Formats RAW 3FR, TIFF (8-bit) Recorded Resolution 5412 x 7212 pixels Comes with 80mm f/2.8 HC Auto Focus Lens (which alone sells for a little bit over $2,000 at B&H) All for a mere ... $43,995.00 (By the way, folks - my birthday is next week! Just sayin'....... )
|
| |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 112 From: Snoqualmie, WA My Camera: Nikon D70 |
I was reading that the Hasselblad is only good for studio work. For action, sports/nature...etc the D3 or a Canon 1D is better suited. I have seen studio work from the Hasselbald though. The colors and sharpness are (drool) |
| |
| | #6 |
| Member Joined: Feb 2009 Posts: 44 From: monroe wa My Camera: Nikon D300 - D3 |
I like the D3 also - with a 300 backup
|
| |
| | #7 |
| Member Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 63 From: a van down by the river My Camera: Samsung SGH-T809 |
I'd love to get one of those big fancy cameras but 1) I don't have the coin 2) I'm so on the go i can't be weighed down with extra equipment and 3) I have nothing lacking that i need to compensate for... What I have seems to work for me just fine 85% of the time even tho its always a real challenge to get any kind of good shot. |
| |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 227 From: Oly |
D90 became right for me today when fedex arrived at my door.
|
| |